Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on December 20, 2004

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/7/712    most recent
ehi069v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brignole, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brignole, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Heart Journal © The European Society of Cardiology 2004; all rights reserved

Clinical research

Comparative assessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation

M. Brignole 1*, M. Gammage 2, E. Puggioni 1, P. Alboni 3, A. Raviele 4, R. Sutton 5, P. Vardas 6, M. G. Bongiorni 7, L. Bergfeldt 8, C. Menozzi 9, G. Musso 10, and on behalf of the Optimal Pacing SITE (OPSITE) Study Investigators

1 Department of Cardiology, Ospedali del Tigullio, Via don Bobbio, 16033 Lavagna, Italy
2 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile, Cento, Italy
4 Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Umberto I, Mestre, Italy
5 Department of Cardiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
6 Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Heraklion, Greece
7 Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, Italy
8 Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
9 Department of Cardiology, Ospedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
10 Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile, Imperia, Italy

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
M. Brignole, E-mail: mbrignole{at}asl4.liguria.it


   Abstract

Aims Left ventricular (LV) and biventricular (BiV) pacing are potentially superior to right ventricular (RV) apical pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation and pacing for permanent atrial fibrillation.

Methods and results Prospective randomized, single-blind, 3-month crossover comparison between RV and LV pacing (phase 1) and between RV and BiV pacing (phase 2) performed in 56 patients (70 ± 8 years, 34 males) affected by severely symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation, uncontrolled ventricular rate, or heart failure. Primary endpoints were quality of life and exercise capacity. Compared with RV pacing, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ) score improved by 2 and 10% with LV and BiV pacing, respectively, the effort dyspnoea item of the Specific Symptom Scale (SSS) changed by 0 and 2%, the Karolinska score by 6 and 14% (P < 0.05 for BiV), the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class by 5 and 11% (P < 0.05 for BiV), the 6-min walked distance by 12 (+4%) and 4m (+1%), and the ejection fraction by 5 and 5% (P < 0.05 for both). BiV pacing but not LV pacing was slightly better than RV pacing in the subgroup of patients with preserved systolic function and absence of native left bundle branch block. Compared with pre-ablation measures, the Minnesota LHFQ score improved by 37, 39, and 49% during RV, LV, and BiV pacing, respectively, the effort dyspnoea item of the SSS by 25, 25, and 39%, the Karolinska score by 39, 42, and 54%, the NYHA class by 21, 25, and 30%, the 6-min walking distance by 35 (12%), 47 (16%), and 51m (19%) and the ejection fraction by 5, 10, and 10% (all differences P < 0.05).

Conclusions Rhythm regularization achieved with AV-junction ablation improved quality of life and exercise capacity with all modes of pacing. LV and BiV pacing provided modest or no additional favourable effect compared with RV pacing.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Heart failure; Bundle branch block; Catheter ablation; Resynchronization pacing.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. Gasparini, F. Regoli, P. Galimberti, C. Ceriotti, and A. Cappelleri
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation
Europace, November 1, 2009; 11(suppl_5): v82 - v86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Leclercq, L. Padeletti, R. Cihak, P. Ritter, G. Milasinovic, D. Gras, V. Paul, I.C. Van Gelder, C. Stellbrink, G. Rieger, et al.
Incidence of paroxysmal atrial tachycardias in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy and continuously monitored by device diagnostics
Europace, October 28, 2009; (2009) eup318v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. F. Tops, M. J. Schalij, and J. J. Bax
The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 25, 2009; 54(9): 764 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. P. H.M. Delnoy, J. P. Ottervanger, H. O. Luttikhuis, D. H.S. Vos, A. Elvan, A. R. Ramdat Misier, W. P. Beukema, P. Steendijk, and N. M. van Hemel
Pressure-volume loop analysis during implantation of biventricular pacemaker/cardiac resynchronization therapy device to optimize right and left ventricular pacing sites
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2009; 30(7): 797 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. S. Kamath, D. Cotiga, J. N. Koneru, A. Arshad, W. Pierce, E. F. Aziz, A. Mandava, S. Mittal, and J. S. Steinberg
The Utility of 12-Lead Holter Monitoring in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation for the Identification of Nonresponders After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 24, 2009; 53(12): 1050 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. Proclemer, G. Allocca, D. Gregori, C. Bonanno, R. Ometto, A. Fontanelli, R. Mantovan, M. Crosato, V. Calzolari, D. Pavoni, et al.
Radiofrequency ablation of drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: an observational study comparing 'ablate and pace' with pulmonary vein isolation
Europace, September 1, 2008; 10(9): 1085 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
A. S. Manolis, D. Sakellariou, and G. K. Andrikopoulos
Alternate Site Pacing in Patients at Risk for Heart Failure
Angiology, August 1, 2008; 59(2_suppl): 97S - 102S.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
A. M. Ferreira, P. Adragao, D. M. Cavaco, R. Candeias, F. B. Morgado, K. R. Santos, E. Santos, and J. A. Silva
Benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in atrial fibrillation patients vs. patients in sinus rhythm: the role of atrioventricular junction ablation
Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 809 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. Szili-Torok, A. Mihalcz, and L. Jordaens
The 'Happy Ending Problem' of cardiac pacing? Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure after atrioventricular junction ablation
Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 779 - 781.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Leclercq, F. Gadler, W. Kranig, S. Ellery, D. Gras, A. Lazarus, J. Clementy, E. Boulogne, J.-C. Daubert, and for the TRIP-HF (Triple Resynchronization In Paced
A Randomized Comparison of Triple-Site Versus Dual-Site Ventricular Stimulation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1455 - 1462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
E. S. Tan, M. Rienstra, A. C.P. Wiesfeld, B. A. Schoonderwoerd, H. H.F. Hobbel, and I. C. Van Gelder
Long-term outcome of the atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker implantation for symptomatic refractory atrial fibrillation
Europace, April 1, 2008; 10(4): 412 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
L. Padeletti, P. Pieragnoli, V. Jentzen, and A. Schuchert
The comorbidity of atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a challenge for electrical therapies
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2007; 9(suppl_I): I81 - I86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al.
Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: executive summary: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork (AFNET) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2803 - 2817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
H.-R. Neuberger, C. Mewis, D. J. van Veldhuisen, U. Schotten, I. C. van Gelder, M. A. Allessie, and M. Bohm
Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2568 - 2577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
P. Kirchhof, A. Auricchio, J. Bax, H. Crijns, J. Camm, H.-C. Diener, A. Goette, G. Hindricks, S. Hohnloser, L. Kappenberger, et al.
Outcome parameters for trials in atrial fibrillation: Recommendations from a consensus conference organized by the German Atrial Fibrillation Competence NETwork and the European Heart Rhythm Association
Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(11): 1006 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
F. Zannad, E. Huvelle, K. Dickstein, D. J. van Veldhuisen, C. Stellbrink, L. Kober, S. Cazeau, P. Ritter, A. P. Maggioni, R. Ferrari, et al.
Left bundle branch block as a risk factor for progression to heart failure
Eur J Heart Fail, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 7 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. F. Tops, M. J. Schalij, E. R. Holman, L. van Erven, E. E. van der Wall, and J. J. Bax
Right Ventricular Pacing Can Induce Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Atrioventricular Node Ablation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1642 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. H. Schoenfeld
Alternative Site Pacing to Promote Cardiac Synchrony: Has Conventional Pacing Become Unconventional?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 1946 - 1948.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Kindermann, B. Hennen, J. Jung, J. Geisel, M. Bohm, and G. Frohlig
Biventricular Versus Conventional Right Ventricular Stimulation for Patients With Standard Pacing Indication and Left Ventricular Dysfunction: The Homburg Biventricular Pacing Evaluation (HOBIPACE)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 16, 2006; 47(10): 1927 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Stellbrink
Heart rate, regularity, and synchronicity in heart failure: a tale of three brothers
Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2005; 26(7): 637 - 638.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.