Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on October 13, 2005

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi584
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/3/344    most recent
ehi584v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Heart Journal © The European Society of Cardiology 2005; all rights reserved
Received June 7, 2005
Revised August 18, 2005
Accepted September 22, 2005

Clinical research

Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history

Robert Sheldon 1*, Sarah Rose 1, Stuart Connolly 2, Debbie Ritchie 1, Mary-Lou Koshman 1, Michael Frenneaux 3, and for the Syncope Symptom Study Investigators

1 Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N2, Canada
2 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
3 Wales Heart Institute, Cardiff, Wales, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Robert Sheldon, E-mail: sheldon{at}ucalgary.ca


   Abstract

Aims Our goal was to develop historical criteria for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope.

Methods and results We administered a 118-item historical questionnaire to 418 patients with syncope and no apparent structural heart disease. The prevalence of each item was compared between patients with positive tilt tests and those with syncope of other, known causes. The contributions of symptoms to diagnoses were estimated with logistic regression, point scores were developed, and the scores were tested using receiver operator characteristic analysis. The accuracy of the decision rule was assessed with bootstrapping. Data sets were complete for all subjects. The causes of syncope were known in 323 patients and included tilt-positive vasovagal syncope (235 patients) and other diagnoses such as complete heart block and supraventricular tachycardias (88 patients). The point score correctly classified 90% of patients, diagnosing vasovagal syncope with 89% sensitivity and 91% specificity. The decision rule suggested that 68% of an additional 95 patients with syncope of unknown cause and a negative tilt test have vasovagal syncope.

Conclusion A simple point score of historical features distinguishes vasovagal syncope from syncope of other causes with very high sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords: Vasovagal; Syncope; Diagnosis; Tilt test; Faint; Point scores; History.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Developed in collaboration with, European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Heart Failure Association (HFA), and Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Endorsed by the following societies, European Society of Emergency Medicine (EuSEM), European Federation of Internal Medicine (EFIM), European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS), American Geriatrics Society (AGS), European Neurological Society (ENS), et al.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2009; 30(21): 2631 - 2671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. S. Rose, M.-L. Koshman, D. Ritchie, and R. Sheldon
The development and preliminary validation of a scale measuring the impact of syncope on quality of life
Europace, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1369 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
M. D. Gammage
Impact of syncope on quality of life: do we need another tool?
Europace, October 1, 2009; 11(10): 1265 - 1266.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A Del Rosso, A Ungar, R Maggi, F Giada, N R Petix, T De Santo, C Menozzi, and M Brignole
Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope at initial evaluation in patients referred urgently to a general hospital: the EGSYS score
Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1620 - 1626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. D. Thijs, W. A. Wagenaar, H.A.M. Middelkoop, W. Wieling, and J. G. van Dijk
Transient loss of consciousness through the eyes of a witness
Neurology, November 18, 2008; 71(21): 1713 - 1718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
L. Y. Chen, D. G. Benditt, and W.-K. Shen
Management of Syncope in Adults: An Update
Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2008; 83(11): 1280 - 1293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
S. Petkar and A. Fitzpatrick
Tilt-table testing: transient loss of consciousness discriminator or epiphenomenon?
Europace, June 1, 2008; 10(6): 747 - 750.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. P. Vlahos, M. Tzoufi, C. S. Katsouras, T. Barka, I. Sionti, L. K. Michalis, A. Siamopoulou, and T. M. Kolettis
Provocation of Neurocardiogenic Syncope During Head-up Tilt Testing in Children: Comparison Between Isoproterenol and Nitroglycerin
Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(2): e419 - e425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Serletis, S. Rose, A. G. Sheldon, and R. S. Sheldon
Vasovagal syncope in medical students and their first-degree relatives
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2006; 27(16): 1965 - 1970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. A. Morillo
Evidence-based common sense: the role of clinical history for the diagnosis of vasovagal syncope
Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2006; 27(3): 253 - 254.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.