European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on January 16, 2006
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi736
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Aims Although embolic protection devices reduce complications during saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenting, adverse events still occur in Methods and results In the prospective, multicentre FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation trial, 651 patients undergoing SVG stenting were randomized to either filter-based FilterWire EX or balloon occlusion/aspiration GuardWire embolic protection devices. IIb/IIIa inhibitor use was at the discretion of the investigator, with randomization stratified by intended use. Patients pre-selected for IIb/IIIa inhibitor use (n = 345) had higher baseline risk, with increased 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE, 13.0 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.03). GuardWire assigned patients treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors had higher 30-day MACE compared with those not treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors (16.0 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.007). In contrast, MACE in high-risk FilterWire patients treated with IIb/IIIa inhibitors were similar to their lower risk, untreated counterparts (9.9 vs. 9.5%, P = 0.89). Multivariable analysis detected a borderline significant (P = 0.056) interaction for lower MACE between FilterWire and IIb/IIIa inhibitor use. Adjustment by the propensity to use IIb/IIIa inhibitors resulted in a significant (P = 0.023) interaction for lower MACE rates. IIb/IIIa inhibition in conjunction with FilterWire was associated with less abrupt closure, no reflow, or distal embolization. Conclusion IIb/IIIa antagonists may improve procedural outcome during SVG stenting in high risk patients, utilizing filter-based embolic protection devices.
Received March 7, 2005
Revised November 23, 2005
Accepted December 22, 2005
Clinical research
Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition as adjunctive treatment during saphenous vein graft stenting: differential effects after randomization to occlusion or filter-based embolic protection
Michael Jonas 1,
Gregg W. Stone 2,
Roxana Mehran 2,
James Hermiller 3,
Robert Feldman 4,
Howard C. Herrmann 5,
David A. Cox 6,
Richard E. Kuntz 1,
Jeffrey J. Popma 1,
Campbell Rogers 1 *,
and
for the FilterWire EX Randomized Evaluation (FIRE) Investigators
2 New York Presbyterian Hospital/Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA
3 St Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA
4 Evanston Hospital, Evanston, IL, USA
5 Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
6 6Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, NC, USA
Campbell Rogers, E-mail: crogers{at}partners.org
![]()
Abstract
10% of patients. IIb/IIIa antagonists have not been proven effective during SVG intervention. We hypothesized that adjunctive use of these agents might enhance the efficacy of embolic protection devices.![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. J. Cooper, S. T. Haller, W. Colyer, M. Steffes, M. W. Burket, W. J. Thomas, R. Safian, B. Reddy, P. Brewster, M. A. Ankenbrandt, et al. Embolic Protection and Platelet Inhibition During Renal Artery Stenting Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2752 - 2760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Coolong, D. S. Baim, R. E. Kuntz, A. J. O'Malley, S. Marulkar, D. E. Cutlip, J. J. Popma, and L. Mauri Saphenous Vein Graft Stenting and Major Adverse Cardiac Events: A Predictive Model Derived From a Pooled Analysis of 3958 Patients Circulation, February 12, 2008; 117(6): 790 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mauri, C. Rogers, and D. S. Baim Devices for Distal Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Circulation, June 6, 2006; 113(22): 2651 - 2656. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. O. Niemela Comeback for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary interventions for saphenous vein bypass grafts: may be for distal protection with filter-based devices? Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 891 - 892. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

