Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on February 13, 2006

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehi794
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/7/882    most recent
ehi794v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kearney, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kearney, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

European Heart Journal © The European Society of Cardiology 2006; all rights reserved
Received January 19, 2006
Accepted January 26, 2006

ESC Workshop Report

Improving patient access to novel medical technologies in Europe

Peter Kearney 1 *, Graham Stokoe 2, Günter Breithardt 3, Carole Longson 4, Jean Marco 5, John Morgan 6, Silvia Priori 7, Alric Ruether 8, Rod Taylor 9, Michaël Hertog 10, and on behalf of the Taskforce 2 of the ESC-Cardiovascular Round Table

1 Department of Cardiology, Cork University Hospital Wilton, Cork, Ireland
2 Guidant Europe, Park Lane, Culliganlaan 2B, Diegem, Belgium
3 Universitätssklinikum Münster, Albert-Schweitzer Strasse 33, Münster, Germany
4 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, MidCity Place, London, UK
5 Clinique Pasteur, Unité de Cardiologie Interventionnelle, Toulouse Cedex 3, France
6 Wessex Cardiac Centre, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK
7 IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Department of Molecular Cardiology, Pavia, Italy
8 DIMDI-German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information, Waisenhausgasse, Köln, Germany
9 Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
10 European Society of Cardiology (ESC), 2035, Route des Colles, BP 179, F-06903, Sophia Antipolis, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Peter Kearney, E-mail: peterkearney{at}eircom.net


   Abstract

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) organized a one-day workshop with clinicians, health economic experts, and health technology appraisal experts to discuss the equity of patient access to novel medical technologies in Europe. Two index technologies were considered: implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and drug-eluting stents (DES). The use of ICDs range from 35 implants/million population in Portugal to 166 implants/million population in Germany, whereas for implants of DES (as percentage of total stents) it is lowest in Germany at 14% and high in Portugal at 65%. These differences can in part be explained by a lack of structured implementation of guidelines, the direct cost in relation to the overall healthcare budget, and to differences in procedures and models applied by Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies in Europe. The workshop participants concluded that physicians need to be involved in a more structured way in HTA and need to become better acquainted with its methods and terminology. Clinical guidelines should be systematically translated, explained, disseminated, updated, and adopted by cardiologists in Europe. Clinically appropriate, consistent and transparent health economic models need to be developed and high-quality international outcome and cost data should be used. A process for funding of a technology should be developed after a positive recommendation from HTA agencies. Both the ESC and the national cardiac societies should build-up health economic expertise and engage more actively in discussions with stakeholders involved in the provision of healthcare.

Keywords: Health technology assessment; DES; Drug eluting stents; ICD; Implantable cardioverter defibrillators; Health economics; ESC guidelines; Funding.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.