European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on October 19, 2006
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl235
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Cardiology and Molecular Cardiology, Internal Medicine III, J.W. Goethe University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Aims Experimental and clinical pilot studies suggest that intracoronary progenitor cell infusion can improve left ventricular function and remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Since progenitor cells are also known to be involved in restenosis development and atherosclerosis progression, an increased restenosis rate may be a risk of intracoronary cell therapy. Methods We performed a retrospective study to compare quantitative angiographic measurements of the infarct target vessel in 83 patients with AMI treated with bare metal stent PCI (matched control) and in 83 patients receiving additional intracoronary progenitor cell infusion at a mean of 5 days post-AMI stent PCI and after 4 months. Results The late loss as a measure of neointima formation was similar between the control and the cell-treated group at follow-up (0.9 ± 0.8 vs. 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, P = 0.9). Moreover, restenosis rate was comparable in both groups (35% control vs. 27% cell-treated group, P = 0.2). Multivariable analysis excluded cell therapy as an independent significant predictor of increased late loss (P = 0.4), whereas acute gain (P = 0.012) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of late loss. Finally, in the cell-treated group, target vessel revascularization rate remained at 28.9% during a median of >3 years of follow-up, thus excluding an effect on atherosclerotic disease progression. Conclusion In patients with AMI successfully treated with bare metal stent PCI, additional intracoronary progenitor cell infusion does not lead to an increased neointima formation within the implanted stent within 4 months or aggravation of atherosclerotic disease progression.
Received August 9, 2005
Revised August 9, 2006
Accepted August 24, 2006
Clinical research
Intracoronary infusion of progenitor cells is not associated with aggravated restenosis development or atherosclerotic disease progression in patients with acute myocardial infarction
Birgit Assmus 1, Dirk H. Walter 1, Ralf Lehmann 1, Jörg Honold 1, Hans Martin 2, Stefanie Dimmeler 1, Andreas M. Zeiher 1, and Volker Schächinger 1 *
2 Department of Haematology, Internal Medicine II, J.W. Goethe University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
Volker Schächinger, E-mail: schaechinger{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de
Abstract 
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K Krause, K Jaquet, C Schneider, S Haupt, M V Lioznov, K-M Otte, and K-H Kuck Percutaneous intramyocardial stem cell injection in patients with acute myocardial infarction: first-in-man study Heart, July 15, 2009; 95(14): 1145 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Dimmeler, J. Burchfield, and A. M. Zeiher Cell-Based Therapy of Myocardial Infarction Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2008; 28(2): 208 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M Cubbon, A. Rajwani, and S. B Wheatcroft The impact of insulin resistance on endothelial function, progenitor cells and repair Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 103 - 111. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. Leone and F. Crea Stem cells in acute myocardial infarction: the good, the bad, and the ugly Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2006; 27(24): 2911 - 2913. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|