European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on January 16, 2007
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl432
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Better, (perhaps) cheaper, but is it best?
Department of Cardiology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Zerifin and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Zerifin 70300, Israel
* Corresponding author. Tel: +972 89779735; fax: +972 89228141. E-mail address: zvi.vered@gmail.com
This editorial refers to Clinical and economic impact of stress echocardiography compared with exercise electrocardiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but negative troponin: a prospective randomised controlled study by P. Jeetley et al., doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl444
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
Patients presented at the emergency room with chest pain, non-characteristic ECG changes and negative Troponin represent a very frequent clinical dilemma. These patients are often hospitalized unnecessarily and frequently undergo non-invasive and even invasive investigations which turn out to be negative. Occasionally, they may falsely be discharged from the ER and eventually develop a major cardiac event. The most common and apparently the cheapest test employed in the evaluation of these patients is standard exercise ECG. Jeetley et al.1 prospectively studied a large group of such patients. The patients