Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on March 30, 2007
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/8/915    most recent
ehm045v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siminiak, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dudek, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siminiak, T.
Right arrow Articles by Dudek, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Fibrinolysis may widen the time window for primary angioplasty

Tomasz Siminiak1,* and Dariusz Dudek2

1 Poznan University School of Medical Sciences, Cardiac and Rehabilitation Hospital Kowanówko, ul. Sanatoryjna 34, 64–600 Kowanówko k/Obornik Wlkp. Poland
2 Department of Interventional Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland

* Corresponding author. Tel: +48 602217202; fax: +48 612977500. E-mail address: tomasz.siminiak@usoms.poznan.pl

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

This editorial refers to ‘Primary angioplasty vs. early routine post-fibrinolysis angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation: the Gracia 2 non-inferiority, randomized, controlled trial’ by F. Fernandez-Aviles et al.

Recently published clinical trials have demonstrated superiority of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) over lysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment. Current practice guidelines1 have established PPCI as a preferred method of reperfusion in STEMI, as long as it can be performed within 90 min from patient's first medical contact. However, in the majority of cases achieving this 90 min time goal proves impossible, mainly because the STEMI care is not streamlined enough between different levels and components of health care system. Accordingly, the optimization of treatment strategy in STEMI patients, who for one reason or another exceed the 90 min delay, is one of the hottest topics in cardiology today. The GRACIA-2 study is certainly an important contribution to . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?