European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on June 22, 2007
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm191
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
1 Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of LeipzigHeart Center, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany
2 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Memorial Hermann Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
Received 8 November 2006; revised 4 April 2007; accepted 13 April 2007.
* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 341 8651426/1428; fax: +49 341 865 1461. E-mail address: thielh{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the most common cause of death in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In addition to percutaneous coronary intervention, inotropes, and fluids, intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP) is most widely used for initial haemodynamic stabilization. However, the main limitation of IABP is the lack of active circulatory support and the requirement of a certain level of left ventricular (LV) function. In many patients with severe depression of LV function, haemodynamic support and LV unloading derived from IABP is insufficient to reverse CS. The use of percutaneous LV assist devices (LVAD) with active circulatory support might be beneficial in CS patients not responding to standard treatment including IABP support. This review reports the current experience of percutaneous LVAD in CS complicating AMI.
Key Words: Shock Heart-assist device Heart failure Haemodynamics Myocardial infarction
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. D. Sjauw, A. E. Engstrom, M. M. Vis, R. J. van der Schaaf, J. Baan Jr, K. T. Koch, R. J. de Winter, J. J. Piek, J. G.P. Tijssen, and J. P.S. Henriques A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2009; 30(4): 459 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele and G. Schuler Cardiogenic shock: to pump or not to pump? Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2009; 30(4): 389 - 390. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Thiele, C. Kaulfersch, I. Daehnert, M. Schoenauer, I. Eitel, M. Borger, and G. Schuler Immediate primary transcatheter closure of postinfarction ventricular septal defects Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Hamm, H. Möllmann, J.-P. Bassand, and F. van de Werf CHAPTER 16 Acute Coronary Syndromes ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members, F. Van de Werf, J. Bax, A. Betriu, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, F. Crea, V. Falk, G. Filippatos, K. Fox, K. Huber, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology: Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2008; 29(23): 2909 - 2945. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

