Skip Navigation


European Heart Journal Advance Access first published online on July 18, 2007
This version published online on August 18, 2007

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm242
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/18/2238    most recent
ehm242v2
ehm242v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faber, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faber, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during permanent pacemaker therapy in low-risk patients results from the German multicentre EVENTS study

Thomas S. Faber1,*, Robert Gradinger1, Sven Treusch2, Carsten Morkel2, Johannes Brachmann3, Christoph Bode1, Manfred Zehender for the EVENTS Investigators1

1 Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
2 Guidant GmbH, Germany
3 Klinikum Coburg, Germany

Received 23 October 2006; revised 6 May 2007; accepted 18 May 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +49 761 270 3548; fax: +49 761 270 7309. E-mail address: faber{at}med1.ukl.uni-freiburg.de

Aims: Current studies found an incidence of 12–31% ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death during cardiac pacing months or even years after pacemaker insertion. MADIT12 and MUSTT13 demonstrated that patients with poor LV function after Myocardial infarction (MI) showing non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT) and inducibility during electrophysiologic testing benefit from an ICD. The present study was dedicated to assess the global incidence of non-sustained ventricular arrhythmias in a general population of pacemaker patients. Special regard was on patients with a potential ICD indication, e.g. those matching the MADIT/MUSTT criteria.

Methods and results: Two hundred and thirty-one patients (72 ± 11 years; 134 men) with an indication for dual chamber pacing entered the study. In all patients pacemaker systems capable of automatic storing of intracardiac electrocardiograms were implanted (Pulsar®, Discovery®, Guidant). Follow-up time was 15 months after inclusion. In 54 (25.7%) of 210 patients with at least one follow-up, episodes of nsVT were documented by stored electrocardiograms (up to >30 beats, >200 b.p.m.). Multiple—up to nine—episodes of ventricular tachycardia were retrieved in 31 of these patients. Three out of 14 patients with an LVEF <40% after MI presented nsVT during the follow-up. One of these patients received an ICD.

Conclusion: A significant number of pacemaker patients present with ventricular tachycardia. Intracardiac electrocardiograms and alert functions from pacemakers may enhance physicians' awareness of the patient's intrinsic arrhythmic profile and help uncover underlying mechanisms of arrhythmias by storing the initiation of the arrhythmia.

Key Words: Ventricular arrhythmia • Pacemaker • Sudden death


The originally published version of this paper was incorrect. The author affiliations and conflict of interest information has been amended.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.