Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on September 20, 2007

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/20/2438    most recent
ehm369v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dobrzycki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Musial, W. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dobrzycki, S.
Right arrow Articles by Musial, W. J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The European Society of Cardiology 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Transfer with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban for primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. on-site thrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a randomized open-label study for patients admitted to community hospitals

Slawomir Dobrzycki1, Pawel Kralisz1,*, Konrad Nowak1, Przemyslaw Prokopczuk1, Waclaw Kochman1, Janusz Korecki2, Boguslaw Poniatowski2, Jerzy Zuk1, Ewa Sitniewska1, Hanna Bachorzewska-Gajewska1, Jerzy Sienkiewicz3 and Wlodzimierz J Musial2

1 Department of Invasive Cardiology, State Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Bialystok, Sklodowskiej 24a, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
2 Department of Cardiology, State Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland
3 Department of Statistics and Medical Informatics, Medical University of Bialystok, Poland

Received 27 November 2006; revised 25 July 2007; accepted 3 August 2007.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +48 857468496; fax +48 85 7468828. E-mail address: paqral{at}yahoo.com

Aims: Our study aimed to compare two reperfusion strategies in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) admitted initially to a community hospital without catheterization facilities.

Methods and results: Four hundred and one patients with STEMI admitted to community hospital (13 hospitals, radius 20–150 km from cath-lab) were randomized to on-site thrombolysis or to transport with tirofiban (10 µg/kg bolus i.v. + i.v. infusion 0.1 µg/kg/min) for primary PCI in single invasive centre. Primary endpoints were total mortality, recurrent MI (re-AMI), and stroke during 1 year follow-up. Delay to reperfusion defined as interval between admission and start of fibrinolysis or primary PCI was 35 and 145 min (P < 0.0001). Mean time of tirofiban administration to PCI in transfer group was: 122.3 ± 35.7 min. Mortality was not different during hospitalization and at 30th-day, with trend towards lower mortality at 1 year in transport group (12.5 vs. 7.0%, P = 0.061). There were no differences in the rate of re-AMI and stroke, with trend towards lower incidence of re-AMI in transfer group at 1 year (7.5 vs. 3.5%, P = 0.073). Composite of death/re-AMI/stroke was higher in on-site group during follow-up (15.5 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.019; 21.5 vs. 11.4%, P = 0.006, respectively, at 30th-day and 1 year).

Conclusion: Outcomes at 1 year follow-up suggest that transportation with adjunctive therapy with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban for primary PCI is superior to on-site thrombolysis for patient with STEMI presenting to hospital without catheterization facilities.

Key Words: ST-elevation myocardial infarction • Primary PCI • Thrombolysis • Transfer • Platelet GP IIb/IIIa • Tirofiban


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.