European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on December 21, 2007
European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm587
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Myeloperoxidase, but not C-reactive protein, predicts cardiovascular risk in peripheral arterial disease
1 Department of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular and Immunological Sciences, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Naples ‘Federico II’, Via Pansini 5, Naples, Italy
Received 3 May 2007; revised 14 November 2007; accepted 22 November 2007.
* Corresponding author: Via G. Iannelli 45/A, 80131 Napoli, Italy. Tel/Fax: +39 081 7462240, Email: brevetti{at}unina.it
Aims: The prognostic role of inflammation in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remains to be conclusively established. Accordingly, in these patients we investigated the impact of myeloperoxidase (MPOx) and C-reactive protein on the incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke.
Methods and results: Of 156 PAD patients, 10 had a myocardial infarction and seven a stroke, during follow-up. We used the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the bootstrap approach to identify the MPOx, C-reactive protein, and ankle brachial index (ABI) threshold levels that provided the best cut-off to predict the outcome. For MPOx a cut-off 
183.7 pM was independently associated with a poor outcome (HR = 6.80, 95% CI 1.20–38.69, P = 0.031). The result remained unmodified when MPOx was used as a continuous variable (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05, P = 0.031). Conversely, C-reactive protein was not a prognostic determinant in our series (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.60–1.29, P = 0.514). Kaplan–Meier curves for the four groups of patients delineated according to ABI and MPOx values identified using the bootstrap approach showed that the addition of MPOx measurement to ABI improved the ability to identify patients at risk for myocardial infarction and stroke.
Conclusion: In PAD, MPOx, but not C-reactive protein, predicts an increased risk of major cardiovascular events, and adds to the prognostic value of ABI, currently the most powerful prognostic indicator in these patients.
Key Words: Peripheral arterial disease • Inflammation • C-reactive protein • Myeloperoxidase • Prognosis • Cardiovascular diseases
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  F. J Khawaja and I. J Kullo Novel markers of peripheral arterial disease Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2009; 14(4): 381 - 392. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. B. Wright, Y. Moon, M. C. Paik, T. R. Brown, L. Rabbani, M. Yoshita, C. DeCarli, R. Sacco, and M. S.V. Elkind Inflammatory Biomarkers of Vascular Risk as Correlates of Leukoariosis Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3466 - 3471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. M. McDermott and D. M. Lloyd-Jones The role of biomarkers and genetics in peripheral arterial disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 29, 2009; 54(14): 1228 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Ali, P. Sarcia, T. H Mosley, V. Kondragunta, and I. J Kullo Association of serum myeloperoxidase with the ankle-brachial index and peripheral arterial disease Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2009; 14(3): 215 - 220. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. K. Schindhelm, L. P. van der Zwan, T. Teerlink, and P. G. Scheffer Myeloperoxidase: A Useful Biomarker for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification? Clin. Chem., August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1462 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. K. Rudolph, V. Rudolph, and S. Baldus Contribution of Myeloperoxidase to Smoking-dependent Vascular Inflammation Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2008; 5(8): 820 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. L. Gornik Peripheral arterial disease enters the biomarker era. Does risk stratification tell us something that we don't already know? Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2008; 29(2): 150 - 152. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|