Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on April 25, 2008

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn171
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/11/1386    most recent
ehn171v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veltman, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by van der Giessen, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veltman, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by van der Giessen, W. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Four-year follow-up of treatment with intramyocardial skeletal myoblasts injection in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy

Caroline E. Veltman1, Osama I.I. Soliman1, Marcel L. Geleijnse1, Wim B. Vletter1, Pieter C. Smits1, Folkert J. ten Cate1, Luc J. Jordaens1, Aggie H.H.M. Balk1, Patrick W. Serruys1, Eric Boersma1, Ron T. van Domburg1 and Wim J. van der Giessen1,2,*

1 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Thoraxcentre, Room Ba 587, Erasmus MC, Gravendijkwal 230, PO Box 2040, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, ICIN-KNAW, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Received 31 October 2007; revised 22 March 2008; accepted 4 April 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +31 10 703 52 45, Fax: +31 10 703 43 20, Email: w.j.vandergiessen{at}erasmusmc.nl

Aims: Studies reporting improved left ventricular (LV) function of percutaneous skeletal myoblast (SkM) injection in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy had follow-up not exceeding 12 months, and did not include a control group. Our group has reported evidence for myoblast efficacy in the first five out of the 14 treated patients. The objective of the present evaluation was to assess if these effects were sustained at long-term follow-up. We compared function of patients treated with SkM 4 years earlier with a matched control group. Secondary endpoints included mortality, NYHA class, N-terminal pro-B-natriuretic peptide levels, incidence of arrhythmias, and quality of life.

Methods and results: Fourteen patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who underwent SkM injection were compared with 28 non-randomized control patients matched for age, sex, location, and extent of myocardial infarction. Contrast echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was performed to compare global and regional LV function. At 4-year follow-up, three patients (21%) had died in the treated group and 11 patients (39%) in the control group (P = 0.8). In the survivors, LV ejection fraction (EF) was 35 ± 10% and 37 ± 9% in the SkM group and 36 ± 8% and 36 ± 6% in the controls at baseline and 4 years follow-up, respectively (P = 0.96 between groups at follow-up). TDI-derived systolic velocity in the injected sites was 5.4 ± 1.8 cm/s in the SkM group when compared with 5.1 ± 1.6 cm/s in corresponding sites in the control group (P = 0.47). None of the secondary endpoints showed a difference between the groups. However, in the patients fitted with an internal cardioverter defibrillator, more arrhythmias leading to interventions occurred in the treated group than in the control group, 87% and 13%, respectively (P = 0.015).

Conclusion: Percutaneous intramyocardial SkM injection in ischaemic cardiomyopathy has no sustained positive effect on resting global or regional LV function, respectively, at 4-year follow-up. Moreover, the procedure may induce a higher risk of developing serious arrhythmias, but larger patient series are required before more precise characterization of the safety and efficacy profile of the procedure is possible.

Key Words: Heart failure • Stem cells • Follow-up studies • Echocardiography • LV function


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. L. Herrmann, A. M. Abarbanell, B. R. Weil, Y. Wang, M. Wang, J. Tan, and D. R. Meldrum
Cell-based therapy for ischemic heart disease: a clinical update.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1714 - 1722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. J. Gavira, E. Nasarre, G. Abizanda, M. Perez-Ilzarbe, A. de Martino-Rodriguez, J. A. Garcia de Jalon, M. Mazo, A. Macias, I. Garcia-Bolao, B. Pelacho, et al.
Repeated implantation of skeletal myoblast in a swine model of chronic myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., August 22, 2009; (2009) ehp342v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Menasche
Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Failure: Are Arrhythmias a Real Safety Concern?
Circulation, May 26, 2009; 119(20): 2735 - 2740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. Macia and P. A. Boyden
Stem Cell Therapy Is Proarrhythmic
Circulation, April 7, 2009; 119(13): 1814 - 1823.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.