Skip Navigation



European Heart Journal Advance Access published online on June 13, 2008

European Heart Journal, doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn247
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
29/13/1608    most recent
ehn247v1
Right arrow E-letters: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when E-letters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Marwick, T. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2008. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Impact of coronary revascularization and transmural extent of scar on regional left ventricular remodelling

Jonathan Chan1, Frederick Khafagi1, Alistair A. Young2, Brett R. Cowan2, Charles Thompson1 and Thomas H. Marwick1,*

1 Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Ipswich Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
2 University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Received 22 February 2007; revised 14 May 2008; accepted 23 May 2008.

* Corresponding author. Tel: +61 7 3240 5340, Fax: +61 7 3240 5399. Email: t.marwick{at}uq.edu.au

Aims: Transmural extent (TME) of myocardial scar, contractile reserve, and perfusion all predict improvement in regional myocardial function after coronary revascularization. We sought their association with regional remodelling after infarction.

Methods and results: We studied 89 patients (age 62 ± 10 years) with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, at least 1 month post infarction. Viability was identified by TME < 75% on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ce-MRI), augmentation at low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (DbE), or >60% uptake on delayed redistribution on TI-201 SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography). Coronary revascularization was performed in 36 patients. Regional LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction were measured with MRI at baseline and after a median follow-up of 18 months.

Of 357 segments identified with subendocardial infarction (TME 0–25%) on ce-MRI, 176 were revascularized. Subendocardial scar segments were associated with reverse regional remodeling during follow-up. Revascularization was an independent correlate of change in EDV, but TME and revascularization showed no interaction with respect to their influence on regional volumes. Contractile reserve was present on DbE in 228 segments, of which 129 were TME 0–25%; remodelling was associated with intervention in non-transmural infarcts showing viability by DbE. Viability was identified by TI-201 SPECT in 381 segments (233 with TME 0–25%), but viability by SPECT was not associated with reverse remodelling. No significant reverse remodelling occurred in segments with intermediate scar thickness (TME 26–75%) or transmural scar, independent of revascularization or viability by DbE or TI-SPECT.

Conclusion: Reverse regional remodelling is associated with subendocardial infarction, especially in the setting of contractile reserve and revascularization.

Key Words: Viable myocardium • Remodelling • Dobutamine echo • SPECT • Revascularization


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.